Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a

novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th

century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in

his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel

criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the

narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into

a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as

hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences

of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the

poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal

Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the

goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in

the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the

theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs.

Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or

Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he

had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive

affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of

goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the

novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every

difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do

believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those

who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character

for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is

without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as

the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that

gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and

useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he

also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to

both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence

of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and

kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a

result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom

offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to

money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object

while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit

from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced

with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the

sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and

dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the

Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no

better than a kind of vermin.’

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose

everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-

to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of

goodness.

 

可以删减下 还有一个

The Independent Spirit——about“ Jane Eyer”

This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. Indubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

---

　　After reading this book I can not help but have different admiration for the master.
Jane Eyre in a low class status, but Mr. Rochester is the upper class of celebrities, their poor-grade status and affect their feelings, but allow them to love more deeply, Jane Eyre is not beautiful in the eyes of the public, and Rochester is in the public eyes and the charm of the gentleman who did not feel that they do not deserve, but also love each other.
Carefully think of it, in addition to Rochester to Jane Eyre scenes playing in my mind into the eternal, wipe it away in my mind is still saying "because I love her - she loves me." The main theme. Although the song heard, but I think if they loved to sing, then how the well-being, the Jane Eyre and Rochester.
Finally, she saw her lover to leave Mr. Rochester has a year's time, said a long long year that is also a short short. Jane Eyre for example. When he chose to leave, take the first step in estate or when the door step, every minute, as a century by general so as to make her suffering. Two individuals who obviously love or love now, but once again separable, unfortunately, is how ah! Can not help but feel sorry for them.
After the separation of each other do not forget the other side, only the other side in the hearts of a person, for them, there is no more important, I believe that each of the people love you the same! This year, for both took place in his possession changes in how change is still Jane Eyre Jane Eyre, she still loves Rochester, Rochester is the same, she always love Jane Eyre.
This reminds me, if I can not help but think of a period of time can dilute all, whether you like it or you do not like. Read "Jane Eyre" after the words I do not want to click, and time can dilute all the more profound of all, any two-dimensional nature of all things, time is the same.
Only a word, forget the forgotten, a fresh start, a start

---

　　

.Jane eyre
English: Jane eyre is a novel color autobiography, it explains the theme: people's value = dignity + love.
Jane. Love living in a parents, sponsor, grew up under the environment of treatment with peers, aunt abandon, cousin contempt, cousin insults and beating of a child... this is the dignity of the ruthless trample, but perhaps because it all, Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit, a kind of inner personality can win.
In rochester, she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness, but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant, but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity, noble and pure heart, no pollution, secular society for the shock, and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation, and slowly and deeply in love with her.
Jane eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified, is a fanpiaoguizhen, is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling, is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected, it is like a cup of water, purify every reader's heart, also cause readers, especially female readers

简爱》
中文：《简爱》是一部带有自传色彩的长篇小说，它阐释了这样一个主题：人的价值＝尊严＋爱。
简。爱生存在一个父母双亡，寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打……这是对一个孩子的尊严的无情践踏，但也许正是因为这一切，换回了简。爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的精神，一种可战胜的内在人格力量。
在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑，反而认为他们是平等的。不应该因为她是仆人，而不能受到别人的尊重。也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染，使得罗切斯特为之震撼,并把她看做了一个可以和自己在精神上平等交谈的人，并且慢慢地深深爱上了她。
《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种化繁为简，是一种返朴归真，是一种追求全心付出的感觉，是一种不计得失的简化的感情，它犹如一杯冰水，净化每一个读者的心灵，同时引起读者，特别是女性读者的共鸣。