- "La Traviata" Du Hougan
Camellia drilled in a corner. A cold, dark, damp, there is no corner of the sun, it is food. However, this Camellia but than other camellias, and any other flowers beautiful, beautiful and elegant, beautiful, beautiful delude one to folly. But all sunshine flowers is yearning. Try, try a little harder, touch the sunshine in the moment of camellias, because the sun in it moist and delicate moment, the wind was broken, it was cold in the corner, unable to climb up again, to touch the reach of sunshine. God is merciful, in order to make up for the fate of its injustice, never let it fade away after the death, but keep it a beautiful world left.
Margaret's tragic love story is so. A young woman in the debauchery and no purpose in life is to find true love, to give up a lot of material be accustomed to enjoy himself, gave up everything to make himself happy for the erosion life habit, only for the sake of the people to love and stay together. From the deep mire climb out, it takes great effort and determination, but also to minimize water pollution by mud. Margaret did, and do very well. Can be so great to pay, is still not understand and out of people, but also selfish and malicious people. Great resistance to eventually make Margaret and his wife separated, misunderstanding makes love to her most in need of comfort to her, this is what a painful thing? Perhaps really only death can save her. Yes, Margaret is dead, die alone, never extravagant life, had countless lovers also forget her. Living life is a death, when he is quiet.
Perhaps, Margaret is not completely tragic character, at least, she got a true love, her soul has been purified. People only see a lady of her life and enjoy the luxury, but do not know her noble sentiment is yourself. Strange people in capitalist society, I disdain dissolute prostitutes, but forced prostitution. If Margaret had not been born in such a dirty, hypocritical, cruel capitalist era, perhaps she is the virgin Maria. Unfortunately, that society, that era, even the virgin will be defiled. And in Margaret ravished drums, tenacious and the Holy Spirit was readers secretly cry.
Thanks Xiaozhong Ma La Traviata created such a sad but beautiful and respectable woman. However, I hope that has again dead flowers sprout from the soil, rebirth, away from the dark corner, and every day to the sun as partners, even less beautiful, also do not repeat past the tragedy.

---

　　[茶花女读后感500字]读过《茶花女》的人一定知道，它有凄美的爱情和感人的情节，茶花女读后感500字。好的作品总是给人以大团圆结局，但人们总会厌倦;《茶花女》展现给读者的则是相反，以伤感结尾，这是一种遗憾美、缺陷美，在文学艺术中是有一片广泛天地的，它更能反映人们太多太多阴暗面，也向我们展示人与人之间纯洁美好的感情，是一部发人深省的作品。 《茶花女》它讲的是一位漂亮的茶花女的感情历程。遗憾的是，在天使般美貌下是无奈的命运——她是一位烟花女子，也有着不一般的美，引得多少满身铜臭的人拜倒在其石榴裙下，也许你说她迫不得已，但我却要说她从不知羞耻，这样语气也许太重了，可她终日享乐，靠出志肉体维持，满足自己的私欲，她从没想过“身体发肤，受之父母”吗?她任意挥霍，无论金钱、青春，金钱麻目了她的大脑，我不禁要问：金钱真的这私重要吗?男人们一面大张旗鼓也辱骂，用世上最不堪入耳的言语、辱骂她们，却又一面用世上最“文雅、动听”的词语调侃她们，多么虚伪!当然女主人公，玛格丽特不可能这样一辈子，因为出现在作家笔下的人总有一段传奇色彩或不平凡的经历——她与男主人公的凄美爱情。这是一个感人的故事，当然，它由眼泪、忧愁和笑脸给成，和其他爱情故事一样。她们曾一度抛开尘世中的一切烦恼，在清幽、说和的乡下过着天伦般的生活，我敢说，这是玛格丽特最开心的一段人生，但好景总是不长，被男主人公父亲由于阶级观念而棒打鸳鸯，看到这里，我便开始抱不平：人的工作不分贵贱，又何必在乎以前的事呢?况且，这也是玛不想的呀!为什么人性就不能再宽容一点，一点就好!最终玛格丽特因遭受身心重大创伤，郁闷而死，更讽刺的是，在她死后，她的全部财产都拿去变卖，读后感《茶花女读后感500字》。 我几乎是一口气读这的，我感叹，人性的美与在一之间。玛格丽特小姐，徒有一副美的外表，却只能成为人们手中的玩物，兴奋时给你点钱，不兴奋时给你两苍。此时金钱又充当着什么角色呢?精神上的慰籍品还是一个没有生命的伴侣?可内心深处是否真的快乐过? 换个角度想想，这便是人性的软弱，人总也抵不住金钱的诱惑，总了不敢冲破命运枷锁。假如我是她，我会不顾一切地冲破这个黑暗的牢笼，我回属于自己的一片天，快乐地活着，何必在乎金钱!我要用自己的一双手，换回内心的平衡。不可否认，当时，说下去也不是易事，但死有轻于鸿毛，重于泰山，就算不能轰轰烈烈，但也要尽自己最大努力，让自己看得起自己吧!我敢说，当你老了，儿孙满堂时，你会是一个骄傲的老人，你的子女以你为荣 人性总有美与丑，没有丑哪有美?但是尽自己的所能，做好自己吧!这便是我的读后感。 〔茶花女读后感500字〕随文赠言：【这世上的一切都借希望而完成，农夫不会剥下一粒玉米，如果他不曾希望它长成种粒；单身汉不会娶妻，如果他不曾希望有孩子；商人也不会去工作，如果他不曾希望因此而有收益。】

---

　　Those Beautiful Flowers
---Book Review: “Camille”
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?