The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。But it’s this leap of technologies to prolong life and control dying that raises the controversial topic—euthanasia( 安乐死)or mercy killing.
People supporting mercy killing argue that euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients,relieving them from the agonizing pain , which is good for both the doomed people and their families. For these people,staving off death is to compromise a fundamental value—the quality of human life. However,those who object to euthanasia think it is immoral to give up treatment or commit suicide with doctors’ assistance。In their opinions, that is nothing less than murdering.
IN fact, to continue or terminate life is a moral choice because it involves a decision about a fundamental human good , the preservation of life . After all, life is the mast precious asset that we have for creativity and productivity.
求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!
The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
But it's this leap of technologies to prolong life and control dying that raises the controversial topic—euthanasia( 安乐死)or mercy killing.People supporting mercy killing argue that euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients,relieving them from the agonizing pain , which is good for both the doomed people and their families. For these people,staving off death is to compromise a fundamental value—the quality of human life. However,those who object to euthanasia think it is immoral to give up treatment or commit suicide with doctors' assistance。
In their opinions, that is nothing less than murdering.IN fact, to continue or terminate life is a moral choice because it involves a decision about a fundamental human good , the preservation of life . After all, life is the mast precious asset that we have for creativity and productivity.
初一英语作文带翻译:安乐死应不应该合法化
Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely too long, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom. I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books. The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thus eliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.
关于反对安乐死的英语资料
我们昨天外教课期末考试辩论题刚好是这个,这是我的辩论素材。
Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don't only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society. Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible. Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won't try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors' right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is "You shall not kill".Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the "right to die" to "right to kill"?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the "Euthanasia", we can say that he is reasonable? "According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness. Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy. However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to pers...
英语作文Should Euthanasia Be Legalized?
Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized. As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes? Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences in society.
关于安乐死的论文
【例句用法】 1.The shoes are a perfect fit. 这双鞋子穿着非常合脚。
2.Could you tell me the retail prices of these shoes? 你能告诉我这些鞋子的零售价吗? 3.Her shoes chafed the skin on her feet. 鞋子擦破了她脚上的皮肤。
4.The hat and shoes are a perfect match. 这顶帽子和鞋子完全相配。
5.He blacked his shoes before visiting his father-in-law. 在拜访岳父之前,他把鞋子擦黑。
【专用术语】 一、鞋子种类(shoes variety) Athletic shoes /Sports shoes运动鞋 Casual shoes便鞋 Hiking shoes/Travelling shoes旅游鞋 Slipper拖鞋 Sandals凉鞋 Boots马靴 Work boots工作鞋 Axido沙滩鞋 Canvas帆布鞋 Sport boots运动鞋 Pumps高跟鞋 Climbing shoes登山鞋 Football shoes足球鞋 Jogging shoes慢跑鞋 Basketball shoes篮球鞋 Canvas帆布鞋 Casualshoes便鞋 Pumps高跟鞋 Leisure休闲鞋 Tennis shoes网球鞋 Baseball shoes棒球鞋 Aerobic shoes舞蹈鞋 二.部位名称(Location name) upper vamp鞋面 counter后套 binding滚边 last 楦头 top line鞋口 sole edge底边 seams缝合处 bows 饰片 stain染色 adhered粘贴 bumper包头片 steel toe钢头 eyelet and lace鞋眼带 embroidery 电绣 quarter鞋腰(身) Tongue鞋舌 Insole中底 Weit 沿条 Ornament饰物 Toe box头套 Siping切沟 Soles底台 Zigzag万能 Eye stay眼套 Collar领口 Top 面线 Back strap后吊带 Outsole大底 Mid sole-EVA EVA中插 Open toe鞋头开口 Open back鞋后开口 Lace loop穿环 Reinforcements补强 Hand sews手缝马克 Reinforce tape补强带 Inside corners内弯角 Insole board中底纸板 Textile lining布料衬里 Plat forms包边中底台 Wovens/weaves编织类 Lining内里 Heel 脚跟 Foxing护条 Eye let 鞋眼片 Overlay饰片 Socks鞋垫 Box toe鞋衬里 Print印刷 Perforation冲孔 Toe cap鞋头 Toe part鞋头部 Bobbin底线 Bar加强线 【皮革材料】 buckskin 鹿绒皮 buffalo hides 水牛皮 bullhide 公牛皮 calf leather 小牛皮 calfskin, with the hair on, dyed 染色小牛皮 camel leather 骆驼皮革 cattle leather, dyed 染色牛皮 cattle leather, metallized 烫金属牛皮 cattle leather, patent 漆牛皮 crocodile leather 鳄鱼皮 deer leather 鹿皮革 deerskin 鹿皮 deerskin, chamois-dressed 鹿皮 doeskin 羊绒皮 goat leather 山羊皮 goat leather, dyed 染色山羊皮 kangaroo 袋鼠皮 kidskin skin 小羊皮 peccary 野猪皮 pelt 生毛皮 reconstituted and artificial leather containing leather or leather fibre 再生&人造皮革 shark leather 鲨鱼皮 sharkskin 鲨鱼皮 shearling 毛羊皮 sheep and lambskins with the wool 带毛之绵羊及其羔羊皮 sheep and lambskins without the wool 不带毛之绵羊及其羔羊皮 sheep leather 绵羊皮 sheep leather, dyed 染色绵羊皮 sheep leather, metallized 烫金属绵羊皮 sheep leather, patent 漆绵羊皮 skin, rhinceros 犀牛皮 skiver 薄羊面皮 snakeskins, dried 干蛇皮 snakeskins, tanned 加工蛇皮 split leather 榔皮, 二层皮 suede 反毛皮 swine leather, dyed 染色猪皮 swine leather, enamelled 上釉猪皮 swine leather, metallized 烫金猪皮 tassels, leather 皮革饰缝 tiger fur skin, dressed 硝制虎皮 titanium 钛白粉 trimmings, leather 皮制饰品 upper leather of cattle and calf 牛及小牛之面皮 upper leather of goat 山羊面皮
哪些国家允许"安乐死"?
二战后,特别是二十世纪六十年代以来,安乐死又成为人们热衷的话题,立法的呼吁也再度出现,这正式拉开了理论探讨和实践摸索的序幕。
在美国,1969年爱华达州的立法机关讨论了安乐死的法案,1973年俄勒冈州讨论了安乐死法案,1975年发生在新泽西州的昆兰案直接促使了“自然死亡法”的问世,1976年加利福利亚州州长签署了第一个自然死亡法。
在司法实践中,美国不承认对安乐死可以进行合法辩护,但实际上仍然将其不同于一般的杀人罪来看待;在英国,虽然议会对安乐死法案迟迟不能通过,但是其中的努力仍是有目共睹的,从1936年到1970年,英国议会曾多次对安乐死合法化的问题进行辩论。
人们对安乐死的态度越来越倾向于支持,1998年英国进行的一次民意测验表明有72%的人认为安乐死在特定条件下是可行的;在法国,1986年有76%的人希望把安乐死从违法行为中排除掉,而刑事法院也大多对实行安乐死的行为人宣告附缓刑的最低刑;在日本,虽然法律还未承认安乐死合法化,但1960年的一个著名的安乐死案件的判决确定了安乐死合法化的条件,成为后来日本审理安乐死案件的基础;荷兰是世界上第一个让安乐死合法化的国家, 2000年11月,荷兰议会下议院通过了安乐死法案,2001年4月,荷兰议会上议院通过该法案,并定于7月生效;比利时参议院也于2001年3月由参议院的司法及社会事务委员会通过关于安乐死的一项法律提案;在我国,八十年代中期以前,安乐死问题还没有受到注意,从1987年发生了首例安乐死案件后,这一问题受到了人们的极大关注,案件发生后,中央人民广播电台组织的关于安乐死问题的讨论收到了350多封观众来信,其中90%的人明确表示赞成安乐死。
有学者曾对某医学院的172名学生就安乐死问题进行了民意测验,其中持赞同态度的占77%。
可见在我国,支持安乐死合法化的占绝大多数
请大家谈谈对“安乐死”的看法
当一个人来到这个世界,我们无法剥夺他生存的权利; 当一个人不再以正常人的状态生存在这个世界,死成了唯一可行的选择的时候,他需要解脱痛苦,需要尊严的时候,我们不应该残忍,让他来承受病痛的折磨! 如果说,生存是一种权利;那么,在必要的时候,死也是一种权利! 所不同的是,人们用原本善良的心无法在痛苦的现实和痛苦的结果之间做出理智的选择而已。
执行安乐死的三种情况是什么?
1、没有缩短患者生命的安乐死(本来的安乐死、真正的安乐死),这种行为不成立犯罪; 2、具有缩短生命危险的安乐死(间接安乐死)。
这种行为虽然具有缩短患者生命的危险,但事实上没有缩短患者生命,也不成立故意杀人罪; 3、作为缩短患者生命手段的安乐死(积极的安乐死),即为了免除患者的痛苦,而提前结束其生命的方法。
世界上只有个别国家对积极的安乐死实行了非犯罪化。
在我国,救死扶伤是公民的道义责任,是医务人员的职业责任。
对生命垂危、痛不欲生的患者,应尽量给予医务上的治疗和精神上的安慰,以减轻其痛苦。
转载请注明出处作文大全网 » 求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!