我是段花花花花花花
两人对话
A: Good evening! What can I do for you?
B: I'm looking for a pair of black shoes.
A: What size do you want?
B: Size 10.
A: Sorry, I afraid we haven't got any black shoes in that size at the moment. We've got some brown ones.
B: Have you got any other kind?
A: How about those shoes over there.
B: Well, that colour looks nice. How much do they cost?
A: Two hundred yuan.
B: Hmm, that's a bit expensive. Can I try them on?
A: Certainly.
还有
Who is that girl?
--Where?
--Over there,under the big tree.
--Oh, that's my sister.She often takes a light blue blouse and a pink skirk.
--What's on her hair?
--It's an accessory.
--What colour is it?
--It's pink.She likes pink very much.
--How do you like your sister?
--She is cute and lovely,and she works hard.
四人对话：）~
甲;I got a ticket yesterday.
我得到一张处罚单。
乙:You ran a red light.
你闯红灯了。
丙:He nearly ran into the bus.
你差点撞上那辆公共汽车。
丁:Don't take it to heart. You'll never happen again.
别往心里去，下次不会再出现这样的事情了。
乙：Take it easy. There must be some ways to compensate for it.
轻松一点，一定会有补偿的办法的。
丙：Don't be so upset. Everything will be OK.
别这么发愁了，一切都会好起来的。
丁：It's really hard for you.
真难为你了！
A:Thank you!It won't happen again.
谢谢你们，不会再发生了。
英语对话作文
问号与感叹号
这是三个从问号到感叹号的思考过程。
第一个问号是，为什么语文考不出一百分?
记得我上一年级时，特别喜欢上语文课，沈老师常表扬我拼音基础打得牢，考试常常一百分。可是，不知道为什么，到了三年级下，成绩渐渐下降，不要说考一百分，能考出九十五分已十分难得，尽管如此，爸爸仍然鼓励我，当我考试有进步时，他就显得格外兴奋，晚饭时一定要喝上二两。我也曾经十分苦恼，为什么考试越来越难呢?冷静地想一想，分析原因，我认为主要是三年级开始有了作文，作文能得满分几乎不太可能，另外，从考试卷上看，基础部分扣分较多，这与我基础打得不牢有关。词语掌握不够全面，积累少;语文预习不扎实，有时图速度快，囫囵吞枣。
第二个问号是，为什么数学考不出一百分?
有一段时间我对数学课不太喜欢，上课精力不集中。现在虽然有点儿进步，但对新知识仍不能熟练掌握，考试时不能举一反三;在家里预习不能很好坚持，练习也不多，爸爸也不主张打题海战，可我总觉得各类题目做的不多、眼界不宽。
第三个问号是，为什么英语不能经常考一百分?
其实我对英语是比较喜欢的，有时也能考一百分，就是不经常。爸爸也帮助我分析过，主要是基本功不扎实，单词记的快也忘的快，没有做到温故知新;另一方面，听的少、写的少、说的更少。
三个问号使我想起了医生给病人看病，治病前，先要作出准确的诊断，才能拿出治疗方案。刚才谈到的三个问号也就自然引发出了三个感叹号，其实是我针对三门课的学习方案和考出好成绩的决心。
学好语文必须提前一步!老师要求预习，做到全面掌握;老师要求熟读，做到开始背诵;老师要求背诵，做到已经能够熟背。总之，严格要求，提前一步。
学好数学必须举一反三!紧紧抓住课堂45分钟，听进去，真正理解，概念清晰;多练习，会运用，真正掌握，能够举一反三。
学好英语必须多记多用!单词积累很重要，坚持每天背上几个单词，日积月累，词汇就丰富了;多听读、多运用，坚持每天晨读，有时间多与喜欢英语的同学交流，养成英语对话习惯，英语考试满分不是梦。
这是我对于自己成绩的反思，也是从三个问号变成三个感叹号的过程。我希望通过这样的反思可以让我的学习成绩有所提高。
英语对话作文
“Don't scientists have a responsibility to use animals in order to find cures for human diseases?”
Educating people and encouraging them to avoid fat and cholesterol, quit smoking, reduce alcohol and other drug consumption, exercise regularly, and clean up the environment will save more human lives and prevent more human suffering than all the animal tests in the world. Animal tests are primitive, and modern technology and human clinical tests are much more effective and reliable.
Even if we had no alternative to using animals, which is not the case, animal testing would still be ethically unacceptable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “You do not settle whether an experiment is justified or not by merely showing that it is of some use. The distinction is not between useful and useless experiments, but between barbarous and civilized behaviour.” After all, there are probably some medical problems that can only be cured by testing on unwilling humans, but we don’t conduct such tests because we recognize that it would be wrong to do so.
“If we didn’t use animals, wouldn’t we have to test new drugs on people?”
The choice isn’t between animals and people. There is no guarantee that drugs are safe—even if they have been tested on animals—because the physiological differences between humans and other animals prevent the results of animal tests from being accurately extrapolated to humans. Some drugs that have been approved through animal tests can cause serious and unexpected side effects for humans. A 2002 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that in the last 25 years, more than 50 FDA-approved drugs had to be taken off the market or relabeled because they caused “adverse reactions.” In 2000 alone, the prescription drugs removed from the market were the popular heartburn drug Propulsid (removed because it caused “fatal heart rhythm abnormalities”), the diabetes drug Rezulin (“removed after causing liver failure”), and the irritable-bowel-syndrome treatment Lotronex (“removed for causing fatal constipation and colitis”). According to the study’s lead author, “Millions of patients are exposed to potentially unsafe drugs each year.”
If the pharmaceutical industry switched from animal experiments to quantum pharmacology and in vitro tests, we would be better protected from harmful drugs, not less protected.
“If we didn’t test on animals, how would we conduct medical research?”
Human clinical and epidemiological studies, studies on cadavers, and computer simulations are faster, more reliable, less expensive, and more humane than animal tests. Ingenious scientists have used human brain cells to develop a model “microbrain” that can be used to study tumors and have also come up with artificial skin and bone marrow. Instead of killing animals, we can now test irritancy on egg membranes, produce vaccines from cell cultures, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples. As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratories—a company that uses only human tissue and computers to develop and test its drugs—says, “If you have information on human genes, what’s the point of going back to animals?”
“Doesn't animal experimentation help animals by advancing veterinary science?”
The point is not whether animal experimentation can be useful to animals or humans; the point is that we do not have the moral right to inflict unnecessary suffering on those who are at our mercy. Saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on animals to advance veterinary science is like saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on poor children to benefit rich ones.
“Don’t medical students have to dissect animals?”
No, they don’t. In fact, more and more medical students are becoming conscientious objectors who choose to learn by assisting experienced surgeons instead of by using animals. In Great Britain, it is against the law for medical students to practice surgery on animals, and British physicians are just as competent as those who were educated elsewhere. Many of the leading U.S. medical schools, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, now use innovative, clinical teaching methods instead of cruel animal laboratories. Harvard, for instance, offers a cardiac-anesthesia practicum in which students observe human heart bypass operations instead of performing terminal surgery on dogs. The Harvard staff members who developed this practicum have recommended that it be implemented elsewhere.
“Should we throw out all the drugs that were developed and tested on animals? Would you refuse to take them?”
Unfortunately, a number of things in our society came about through the exploitation of others. For instance, many of the roads that we drive on were built by slaves. We can’t change the past; those who have already suffered and died are lost. But what we can do is change the future by using non-animal research methods from now on.
“Don't scientists care about the animals they experiment on? Doesn't their research depend on the animals’ well-being?”
Investigations at even the most prestigious institutions show that this is simply not the case. At the City of Hope in California, one of the country’s most prominent research facilities, animals starved to death and drowned in their own feces. Many experimenters become calloused after years of research and don’t see the animals’ suffering. They treat animals like disposable tools and consider proper animal care to be too expensive.
“Don't peer-review and animal-care committees prevent animal cruelty at institutions?”
No, because many such committees are composed mainly or completely of people who have vested interests in the continuation of animal experimentation. Members of the public were not allowed access to committee meetings until lawsuits were filed.
“Cats and dogs are killed in pounds anyway, so why not let them be used in experiments to save lives?”
A painless death at an animal shelter is a far cry from a life of severe pain and deprivation and an agonizing death in a laboratory.
“Would you support an experiment that would sacrifice 10 animals to save 10,000 people?”
No. Look at it another way: Suppose that the only way to save 10,000 people was to experiment on one mentally challenged orphan. If saving people is the goal, wouldn’t that be worth it? Most people would agree that it would be wrong to sacrifice one human for the “greater good” of others because it would violate that individual’s rights, but when it comes to sacrificing animals, the assumption is that human beings have rights and animals do not. Yet there is no logical reason to deny animals the same rights that protect individual humans from being sacrificed for the common good.
“What about experiments in which animals are observed and not harmed?”
If there really is no harm, we don’t object. But “no harm” means that animals aren’t isolated in barren, cold steel cages because even confinement causes stress and fear, as shown by the differences in blood pressure between caged and free animals. Caged animals also suffer because they are prevented from performing their normal behaviors and social interactions.
“If you were in a fire and could save either your child or your dog, who would you choose?”
I would save my child, but that’s just instinct. A dog would save her pup. Regardless, my choice proves nothing about the moral legitimacy of animal experiments. I might save my own child instead of my neighbor’s, but that hardly proves that experimentation on my neighbor’s child is acceptable.
“Why Should Animals Have Rights?”
Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. For more information, click here.
EU proposes to strengthen protection of animals used in scientific experiments
The European Commission on Wednesday proposed legislation to strengthen the protection of animals used in scientific experiments and to minimize the number of animals being tested on.
The proposal, which intends to strengthen existing European Union (EU) legislation, asks ethical evaluations to be carried out before projects using animals are authorized and lays down minimum requirements on housing and animal care.
The proposed directive covers all live non-human vertebrate animals plus certain other species likely to experience pain. The use of non-human primates is subject to restrictions, and the use of great apes -- chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans -- is banned in scientific procedures. Only when survival of the species itself is at stake, or in the case of an unexpected outbreak of a life-threatening or debilitating disease in human beings, can a member state exceptionally be granted permission for their use.
The proposal seeks to ensure that animals are used only where no other means are available. Their use must be fully justifiable and the expected benefits must outweigh the harm caused to the animals. The proposal would also ensure that animals receive suitable care and treatment such as appropriately sized cages and an environment adapted to each species.
The proposal would also require projects involving animals to be authorized by a competent authority before they can go ahead. Organizations wishing to breed, supply or use animals would be obliged to seek authorization for their activities and for the personnel working with the animals.
"It is absolutely important to steer away from testing on animals. Scientific research must focus on finding alternative methods to animal testing, but where alternatives are not available the situation of animals still used in experiments must be improved," said EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.
英语作文对话
A Conversation
Ann: Good morning, Eva. Happy to see you here. How are you?
Ann：早上好，伊娃。很高兴在这里见到你。你最近还好吗？
Eva: Great. And you?
Eva ：很好！你呢？
Ann: I am good. Thanks. Oh, let me introduce my friend to you, Eva. This is Kate. She comes from America. Kate, this is Eva.
Ann：我很好。谢谢。噢，让我向你介绍一下我的朋友，伊娃。这是凯特，来自美国。凯特，这是伊娃。
Eva: Hello, Kate. Nice to meet you.
Eva：你好，凯特，很高兴见到你。
Kate: Nice to meet you, too. Where are you from?
Kate：我也很高兴见到你。你来自哪里？
Eva: I am from Canada.
EVa：我来自加拿大。
Kate: Oh, really? I went to Canada with my parents before. It’s a great country.
Kate：噢，是吗？我以前和我父母去过加拿大，那是个很美的国家。
Eva: Yes, It’s really great. And America is my favorite country, too.
Eva：是的，很美。美国也是我喜欢的国家。
Kate: I am happy to hear that.
Kate：我很高兴你这么说。
Ann: Vow! I think you two can be good friends. How about go shopping together?
Ann：哇，我觉得你们两可以成为好朋友。一起去逛街怎么样？
Eva & Kate: Good!
Eva&Kate：好的
两个朋友之间的对话 英语作文
两个朋友之间的对话 英语作文A:Hi,James,morning,have you eatten?B:Morning,Jack.oh,not yet.I don't have the rabbit to have breakfast,why do you ask this question?A:I just went to China for a visit.This is how Chinese way of greeting friends.B:I see.That is a little bit strange to me.What if people say no?A:Usually
local people will say yes.it is just like our"how are you?" there
supposed to have the only answer.When you say no,nobody will take you to
eat something.hehehe.B:wow,that is so much fun,I think I need to take a visit there too.A:why not?That is country rich in history and culture.if you need any information,I will be here anytime.B:Thanks,Jack.see you later.A:see you
英语 对话 小作文
a---我 b---我的朋友 c---b的朋友
a:Hi,b!Long time no see,how are you recently?
b:I'm fine.And you?
a:Me,too.So,what's your plan for this weekend?
b:I haven't made my mind yet.How about you?
a:Why not play basketball with me?
b:But where?
a:In the City Stadium.
b:Do you have extra ticket?
a:Of course I have.
b:Ok,it's a deal.
a:Recently,I am thinking about what I should do after work and I want to go to the gymnasium.However I am not the member.Do you know who is the member?
b:c does.
a:Can you persuade him to bring me there?
b:Of course,it's my pleasure.
a:Thank you.
b:That's all right.
希望能帮上你！！
英语对话作文格式
A:hi,Zhou kai ting.What are you doing now ?
B:I'm busy with my homework. I have't take a rest for a long time .
A: You're so great that I can't help admiring your enthusiasm .What's your schedual like ?
B: You know ,I'm a student ,so I take the most time to study .
A: When do you get up in the morning ?
B: Why do you ask me that foolish question? Y ou should know we students get up about 7:50
A: You just said you take the most time to study . Why not get up earlier ?
B: It's my special way to save my energy.
A: What do you usually do in the morning ?
B: I usually play gmes on the Internet .I play the games like crazy .
A: Wait ,wait ,wait ,You said that you spend your most time on your study .
B: I think to play games can improve my intelligence .
A: What do you usually in the afternoon ?
B: Oh, I usually go shoping in a whole afternoon . Don't laugh at me ,it's my way to enrich my knowledge .And I think........
A: Stop stop stop ,I really don't care what you what to say .In my opinion , your schduel is so terrible that I have to criticize you . You should follow me , I spend no time on my study and I am committed to the Internetbar to enjoy the beautiful time !
英语对话作文求帮忙！
A:Hello.
B:Hello,this is Jim speaking.Is Davi there?
A:Speaking.
B:Oh,hi Davi.I'm calling to ask if you'd like to swimming?
A:That sounds good .When?
B:How about 4:00pm tomorrow？
A：Sorry，I'm busy then. How about 6:00pm?
B:OK.Let's plan on that.
A:See you then.Goodbye
B:Bye.
转载请注明出处作文大全网 » 作文英语对话 英语对话小短文
